Annus Horribilis е платена публикация на Стефан Маринов в списание Nature.
Той е платил публикацията, понеже умниците от Nature отказват да я публикуват като научна статия под предлог, че изключително рядко позволяват публикации на "псевдонаучни" (както са я нарекли) новини.
На този линк можете да намерите по-лесно четим вариант:
http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep6/ep6-marin.htmВ долния пост ще публикувам вариант, разпространен по пощенските групи, заради което някои особености при изписването на формулите са променени.
MARINOV: ANNUS HORRIBILIS
The following advertisement appeared in 28 March 1996 issue of Nature.
Следната реклама бе публикувана на 28 март 1996 година в списание Nature.
------------------------------------------------
From an enclosure sent with New Energy News,
Vol. 3, No. 10, April 1996.
On: The Institute for New Energy Web Site at:
www.padrak.com/ine/Permission Given to post anywhere and to anyone.
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
[* Note: Transcribed for Stefan for use on the internet, to be able to
be read by all net browsers. I have replaced all greek letters, vector
notations, and integral signs, etc., by ASCII text A summary of these
replacement definitions appears at the bottom of this paper. Also, text
written in italics has been double-quoted, headings have been
capitalized, and equations are spaced out for clarity. My notes are
only in the square brackets. Patrick Bailey, May 1996.
ine@padrak.com]
------------------------------------------------
The year 1996 will be an earthquake year for conventional physics: many
formulas in the textbooks will be changed, many century-old dogmas will
be renounced and many saints will be de- sainted. This radical change
had to begin tens of years ago but the lack of glasnost in physics all
over the world has delayed it and instead of having evolutional,
step-by-step reformations and several lighter earthquakes, now there
will be a tremendous one., Vours l'avez voulu, Georges Dandins!
By my half-a-century experimental and theoretical work I showed the
following (see references in my 16 books, 60 refereed papers, 8 paid
advertisements and numerous papers and editor's comments in the journal
DEUTSCHE PHYSIK edited by me):
1. THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY IS WRONG.
Indeed, I measured three times optico-mechanically and once
electromagnetically the Earth's absolute velocity. Its magnitude is 350
km/sec with equatorial coordinates of its apex
delta = -20 degrees, alpha = 12" (approx.).
2. THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE IS WRONG.
Indeed, my interferometric "coupled mirrors" experiment which was
carried out during a year showed that when the laboratory's acceleration
was kinematic (acceleration with respect to distant stars), the
laboratory's velocity changed, while when it was dynamic (gravitational
attraction by the Earth) there was no change.
3. THE ENERGY CONSERVATION LAW IS WRONG.
My machines MAMIN COLIU and VENETIN COLIU which work with zero, or near
to zero, Lenz effect, and SIBERIAN COLIU which works with anti-Lenz
effect violated this law. Only because of lack of money I could not
close the energetic circle in the first two, but the third one was not
expensive and I could run it as a "perpetuum mobile." The day when I
shall present this machine at a press-conference will be the start-day
for the earthquake.
4. THE LORENTZ EQUATION IS WRONG.
If there are two electric charges q, q' moving with velocities [vectors]
v, v' and the vector-distance from q' to q is r, according to the
Lorentz equation the [vector] force with which q'v' acts on qv is given
by the following "Grassmann formula"
(1) fG = (mu0 q q' / (4 pi r**3)) {(v dot r) v' - (v dot v') r}.
Numerous experiments done by other authors (Hering's experiments are
from the beginning of the century!) and by me showed that the force
acting on qv can be not only transverse to its velocity, as required by
(l), but also longitudinal. Any rational man when seeing at least one
falsifying experiment rejects the respective formula (Popper). However,
for thousands and thousands of "Betonk?" even a hundred experiments
were not enough. In the photograph there is one such falsifying
experiment which (as well as the other) can be carried out by children:
A cylindrical magnet is cut along one of its axial planes and the one
half is turned up-down (the magnetic forces themselves do the rotation).
Around this magnet, there is a trough filled with mercury in which the
copper ring which can be seen at right swims (the children take salt
solution and suspend the ring on threads). After sending a current of
some tens of amperes from the battery at left, which is regulated by the
rheostat, the ring begins to rotate. That's all!
5. THE LORENTZ-MARINOV EQUATION IS THE RIGHT ONE.
According to (1) f'G [vector] is not equal and oppositely directed to
fG. I obtained Marinov formula by the "most simple and natural
symmetrization" of (1) (take into account that [vector] r = - r')
(2) fm = (fG - f'B)/2
= (mu0 q q'/ (8 pi r**3))
{(v' dot r) v + (v dot r) v' - 2 (v dot v') r}.
Proceeding from (2), and assuming Phi is not 0, and the partial of A
with respect to t [pA/pt, where p is the greek symbol delta here] is
also not 0, I obtained by the "most simple calculations" that the
[vector] force with which an electric system acts on a test charge q
moving with velocity v is
(3) f/q = - grad Phi - (pA/pt) + v x B + v S
= Elor + v x B + v S
where Phi, A are the electric and magnetic potentials generated by the
system at the point of the charge's location, Blor = rot A [vector] is
the "Lorentz magnetic intensity," Swhit = - div A/2 is the "Whittaker
magnetic intensity," and
(4) Bmar = -(mu0 / (8 pi)) Integral { q' (v x v') (r dot v)/v**2 r**3 }
Smar = -(mu0 / (8 pi)) Integral { q' (v dot v') (r dot v)/v**2 r**3
}
are the "Marinov vector" and "scalar magnetic intensities." B = Blor +
Bmar [vectors] is called "vector magnetic intensity" and S = Swhit +
Smar is called "scalar magnetic intensity." (3) is called the
"Lorentz-Marinov equation." If neglecting the last term and under B we
understand Blor we obtain the Lorentz equation which I call the
Lorentz-Grassmann equation. That's the whole theory!
6. THE ANGULAR MOMENTUM CONSERVATION LAW IS WRONG.
My Bul-Cub machine with interrupted current and rotating Ampere bridge
with interrupted current rotated under the action of internal forces
only. Marinov's formula allows violation of the angular momentum
conservation law as the magnetic forces with which two charges interact
are equal and oppositely directed but "may not lie on the line
connecting them."
7. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO VIOLATE THE MOMENTUM CONSERVATION LAW IN
ELECTROMAGNETISM.
Obvious conclusion from Marinov's formula.
8. DISPLACEMENT CURRENT DOES NOT EXIST.
For closed circuits both Grassmann and Marinov formulas do not allow
violation of the momentum and angular momentum conservation laws as the
first terms in (1) and (2) contain total differentials. As conventional
physics believes in the displacement current of Maxwell, it accepts that
all currents always are closed. I showed by numerous experiments that
there is no displacement current (neither in vacuum nor in dielectrics)
and one can interrupt the circuits by the help of condensers. At the
age of 15 I understood that displacement current is a phantasmagoria and
presented to my teacher in Sofia the following objection: "If the
displacement current between the plates of a condenser acts with
magnetic forces on other currents, then according to Newton's third law
the other currents must act with magnetic forces on the displacement
current and set it in motion. But how, comrade teacher, can vacuum be
set in motion?" Teacher's answer was: "Shut up, child"
9. THE GAUGE TRANSFORMATIONS ARE ILLEGITIMATE.
According to conventional physics not the potentials but the intensities
determine the motion of the test charge (exactly the opposite is true),
and thus any change of the potentials which leaves the intensities the
same is allowable, i.e., one can "calibrate" the potentials. It is easy
to see that the calibration div A = 0 is allowable. Thus conventional
physics "believes" that a "really existing force", the Whittaker force
[vector]
fw = - q v div A/2
= q v Swhit
can be put equal to zero.
Monstrosity!
To see the action of fw, take two metal spheres the one charged
positively and the other negatively. Put around one of the spheres a
circular wire along which current flows so that it is perpendicular to
the line connecting the spheres. When connecting the spheres by a wire
and current begins to flow, the circular wire begins to rotate. The
"only force" which acts on the circular wire is fw.
10. THERE IS NO PROPAGATION OF INTERACTION.
As only mass can move from one point to another, "interaction" can be
only a ghost. But a rational man does not believe in ghosts. On the
other hand, the mathematical expressions of Bmar and Smar show that the
"fields" cannot propagate in space with a certain velocity, as Bmar and
Smar depend on the "direction of motion" of the test charge. To these
people who may object that one is not sure whether the Lorentz-Marinov
equation is the right one, my answer is:
Until the day when some falsifying experiment should be presented (this
day will never come!) the world is "impelled" to accept it as true.
11. POTENTIAL, RADIATION AND RADIATION REACTION ELECTRIC INTENSITIES.
These three kinds of intensities can be obtained if putting in the
expression for the Lorentz "electric intensity" [vector] Elor (see (3))
the observation electric and magnetic potentials
(5) Phi = q / (4 pi e0 r)
A = mu0 q v / (4 pi r)
with
r = r' (v' dot r') / c
v = v' + u' r' / c
where r, v, u are distance, velocity and acceleration at the
"observation" moment t and r', v', u' at the "advanced" moment t' = t -
r'/c (conventional physics "wrongly" call t' "retarded moment").
Conventional physics, following Lienard and Wiechert, "wrongly" writes A
with v'. For this reason conventional physics obtains only the
potential and radiation intensities Epot, Erad and "artificially"
introduces the radiation reaction intensity Erea coming to
phantasmagoric "self-accelerations." Proceeding from (5) I (and any
child who can differentiate!) obtained also the radiation reaction
intensity
Erea = - mu0 q w / (6 pi c)
where w = w' is the charge's super-acceleration.
Erad = mu0 q r' x {(r' - v' r' / c) x u'} /
(4 pi (r'- (v' dot r') / c)**3)
is due to "moving mass" (radiated energy), as charges moving with
acceleration lose energy, while Erea acts on the radiating charge
itself. To obtain all radiation effects one has simply to integrate the
obtained formulas for a single charge. That's "nearly" all about
radiation of electromagnetic waves!
12. THERE ARE NO "FIELDS."
According to the "field-marshals" the "fields" exist physically. One
can move them and a moving magnetic field produces electric field, etc.
When I hear all these "stupidities," I get diarrhea. After repeating
the Rowland experiment (a magnetic needle near a charged disk deviates
when the disk is set in rotation), I carried out the inverse one (the
disk at rest, the needle rotates) and the co-moving one (disk and needle
rotate), taking instead of a needle a Hall detector. According to the
"field marshals" the inverse experiment must give the same effect as the
direct one (I observed no effect), while the co-moving experiment must
give null result (I observed the same effect as at the direct
experiment). The Inertial experiment can be done charging a conveyer
belt.
13. CURRENT CONDUCTING WIRES BECOME CHARGED POSITIVELY.
Conventional physics asserts that they remain neutral (Clausius
postulate). Meanwhile always after measurements, the rheostat in the
photograph remained charged and touching it by hand there was a spark.
The positive sign was established by the method known to ancient Greeks.
Every child explains the effect taking into account that the positive
electrode of the battery "sucks" electrons from the wire while the
negative electrodes "spits" electrons and the former effect is
"primary."
14. B-MACHINES AND S-MACHINES.
The electromagnetic machines working on B are called "B-machines" and
these ones working on S are called "S-machines." By the help of the
first three fingers of his right hand any child older than 15 can show
when looking at the third term in (3) that the B-generators "brake."
Meanwhile by the help of only one finger any child younger than 15 can
show when looking at the fourth term in (3) that the S-generators
"accelerate."
15. THE PERPETUUM MOBILE SIBERIAN COLIU.
Swhit is produced by the first term in (2) and for a complete circuit is
null. For this reason Swhit can be observed only at interrupted
circuits (see item 9). However Smar can be different from zero also for
a complete circuit. Why then has nobody observed it? Because all
people have worked with cylindrical or quasi-cylindrical magnets for
which Smar = 0. Who has cut a cylindrical magnet in two pieces rotating
the one half up-down? - NOBODY! The first man who has done this is
called Gennadi Nicolaev and lives in Tomsk in Siberia. For this reason
I called this magnet the SIBERIAN COLIU magnet and the perpetuum mobile
which I constructed with it the SIBERIAN COLIU machine. The machine
shown in the photograph is a SIBERIAN COLIU machine. It will work as a
perpetuum mobile if the "driving" torque produced by the current induced
in the ring when it will be set in rotation with a certain velocity will
be larger than the friction torque. I constructed the machine in the
photograph in 1993 and the last three years I did "nothing else" than to
try to increase its driving torque and decrease its friction torque,
noting that all B-currents induced in the rotor generated additional
friction torque. The driving torque was produced only by the S (i.e.,
Smar) currents. Smar is very strong near the cutting plane, from the
one side positive, from the other negative. The "dozens" of my SIBERIAN
COLIU machines are presented with photographs in DEUTSCHE PHYSIK.
16. ALL CONVENTIONAL THEORIES FOR THE ORIGIN ON EARTH'S MAGNETIZATION
ARE WRONG.
If rotating a cylindrical piece of any metal by a boring machine, one
sees that it becomes magnetized. Conventional physics believes first
that only ferromagnetics become magnetized and second that the
magnetization is proportional to the "angular" rotational velocity, as
this was promulgated by Barnett. My friend C. Monstein demonstrated
that the magnetization is proportional to the "linear" rotational
velocity and I called this the "Monstein-Barnett effect." Proceeding
from the Monstein-Barnett effect, I calculated the magnetization of the
Earth, the Sun and the planets, obtaining excellent coincidences with
the measured values. As Venus is the only planet whose nucleus is
liquid, it is not magnetized. The most cherished conventional theory
for Earth's magnetization is the "unipolar dynamo theory" of Elsasser.
It is "ridiculous," as a unipolar machine can work only at the existence
of sliding contacts and moving with respect to each other parts.
17. MAGRETIC ENERGY DOES EXIST.
By the most elementary speculations and calculations I showed that: a)
the gravitational energy of two masses is not a negative quantity, as
accepted by conventional physics, but a "positive" quantity, b) the
gravitational potential generated by all masses of the universe is equal
to c**2, c) electricity and gravity are two completely analogical
sciences from a mathematical point of view. The "only difference" is
that the gravitational "charges" are the proper masses mb = m/SQRT(1 -
v**2/c**2) and that negative masses do not exist. There are "no" other
differences. Thus, a "magretic energy," i.e., a "magnetic kind" of
energy in gravity, must exist and gravity is to be called
"gravimagretism" (this is the title of part IV of my encyclop椩a work
CLASSICAL PHYSICS). I proposed a "very simple" experiment which can
reveal the existence of magretic energy. This experiment, moreover, can
serve for measurement of the Earth's absolute velocity.
18. THE RECESSION HYPOTHESIS FOR THE GALAXIES IS WRONG.
I call stellar "red shift" this one which is caused by the gravitational
action of the star on the emitted by it light, "galactic" "red shift"
this one which is caused by the gravitational action of the respective
galaxy and "cosmic" - by all cosmic matter. Conventional physics
believes that the big "red shifts" of light coming from remote galaxies
are due to their recession velocities. This is a phantasmagoria. The
most simple calculation, which can be carried out by any child, shows
that they are due to the gravitational action of all cosmic matter and
that they are proportional "not" to the distance to the emitting galaxy
(or quasar) but to the "square" of this distance. I showed that the
experimental data fit "much better" to a square plot. Respectively,
instead of a Hubble constant, a Hubble-Marinov constant is to be
introduced, for which the children obtain the "strictly defined value"
HM**2 = 2 pi delta mu / (3 c**2)
where delta is the gravitational constant and mu is the average mass
density in the Universe.
NOTE: On the 5 March 1996 I submitted to NATURE my paper
"After 500 Years Columbus-Egg-Problem Has Finally Been Solved,"
in which I show how a body can be maintained in an UNSTABLE equilibrium
(problem which, contrary to the general opinion, Columbus has NOT
solved). My "Marinov egg" is supported by magnetic forces. If it has
SPHERICAL form, it has three degrees of freedom (the Euler angles) free
and represents moreover a PERPETUUM MOBILE. If before 1 May the paper
will not appear in the scientific columns of NATURE, I shall publish it
as a paid advertisement. In the first (or second) case 15 days after
the publication I shall present my SIBERIAN COLIU perpetuum mobile at a
press conference.
Stefan Marinov
Morellenfeldgasse 16, A-8010, Graz, Austria
Marinov is Editor of Deutsche Physik,
an International Glasnost Journal on Fundamental Physics.
[* Notes on Notations:
A summary of symbols I replaced in this file for internet transmission:
alpha = the Greek letter alpha.
delta = the Greek letter delta.
e0 = the greek letter epsilon, subscript zero.
mu0 = the greek letter mu, subscript zero.
pi = 3.141592653...
fG = f subscript G, etc.
f'G = f' subscript G, etc.
Phi = the Greek capital letter phi.
pA/pt = the partial derivative of A with respect to t -
(dA/dt using the greek letters delta, not these d's).
x**y = (x)^y = x to the power y.
Integral { x } = the Indefinite Integral of x.
Vectors in the above text:
A
B
Blor
Bmar
Elor
Epot
Erad
Erea
fG
fB
fM
fW
r
u
v
and their primes, etc.
(v x v') = vector cross product of the vectors v and v'
(r dot v) = scalar dot product of the vectors r and v
.. end Note.]
